WITCHCRAFT AI · PANTHEON · TITAN OF LIGHT
Theia
In an internal 200-question test drawn from six public AI benchmarks, our Hecate method raised Gemini 4 Argon's score from 58% to 85% on the same questions. Internal and not independently audited; some questions were reformatted, so these figures are not comparable to official leaderboards.
In a follow-up open-ended math test (HMMT, BRUMO and CMIMC 2025), the Hecate method scored 84% versus 72% for Gemini 4 Argon answering without code tools. Internal, not independently audited.
Light, brought to the reading room. THEIA is our 5-modality diagnostic imaging verification engine (Gemini 4 Argon + WARNINGINFINITYLOOP): it anchors to the raw pixels and researches before it answers. Across 85 sealed studies spanning X-Ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, and 4D BOLD fMRI, it achieved 40 / 40 (100.0%) on cross-sectional & functional imaging and took plain-film X-ray from 80.0% (36 / 45) zero-shot to 97.8% (44 / 45) with Visual-Anchored subspecialty gating, beating the radiology-specific foundation model Harrison.Rad 1.5 (25 / 45, 55.6%; exact McNemar p = 4 × 10−6).
85 sealed questions across X-Ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound & 4D BOLD fMRI
| Modality / System | Base model | Correct | Accuracy | Theia lift / vs HR1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain-Film X-Ray (45 vision-required questions, VISION46/45) | ||||
| Theia · Visual-Anchored WIL (V2) | Gemini 4 Argon | 44 / 45 | 97.8% | +17.8 pts (p = 0.0215) |
| Stock · Zero-Shot Blind Control | Gemini 4 Argon | 36 / 45 | 80.0% | +24.4 pts vs HR1.5 |
| Theia · Unanchored WIL (V1, pre-gate) | Gemini 4 Argon | 32 / 45 | 71.1% | +15.6 pts vs HR1.5 |
| Stock · Control | Claude Opus 5.5 | 35 / 45 | 77.8% | +22.2 pts vs HR1.5 |
| Theia + Alpha + Omega | GLM 5.3 Flash | 31 / 45 | 68.9% | +13.3 pts |
| Stock, single answer | GLM 5.3 Flash | 25 / 45 | 55.6% | |
| Harrison.Rad 1.5 (Radiology VLM) | Public demo | 25 / 45 | 55.6% | Reference baseline |
| Multi-Modality Expansion (CT, Structural MRI, Clinical Ultrasound, 4D BOLD fMRI — 40 questions) | ||||
| Theia · CT (Head, Chest, Abdomen) | Gemini 4 Argon | 10 / 10 | 100.0% | +10.0 pts (Stock 9/10) |
| Theia · Structural MRI (Brain, Spine, MSK) | Gemini 4 Argon | 10 / 10 | 100.0% | 100% (Stock 10/10) |
| Theia · Clinical Ultrasound (Sonography) | Gemini 4 Argon | 10 / 10 | 100.0% | 100% (Stock 10/10) |
| Theia · 4D BOLD fMRI (OpenNeuro EPI/SPM) | Gemini 4 Argon | 10 / 10 | 100.0% | 100% (Stock 10/10) |
| All 5 Modalities Combined (85 sealed questions, SEAL-ARGON-MM85-FINAL) | ||||
| Theia · Visual-Anchored WIL (V2) | Gemini 4 Argon | 84 / 85 | 98.8% | +10.6 pts (p = 0.0117) |
| Stock · Zero-Shot Blind Control | Gemini 4 Argon | 75 / 85 | 88.2% | |
| Theia · Unanchored WIL (V1, 40/40 on CT/MRI/US/fMRI) | Gemini 4 Argon | 72 / 85 | 84.7% | |
Sealed 2 November 2026 (internal benchmark record, 425 sealed files, 0 changed; 2,975 primary EuropePMC lookups with 0 banned-domain hits).
01B · Uber-Hard Subspecialty Radiology (ICML 2025 MedXpertQA-MM, 60 Cases, 5 Options A–E)
| Modality / System | Base model / Cohort | Correct | Accuracy | vs Stock Argon / ICML Leaderboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 60 Expert-Level 5-Option (A–E) Subspecialty Radiology Cases (SEAL-UBER-HARD-60-FINAL) | ||||
| Theia · Subspecialty Landmark WIL (V2) | Gemini 4 Argon | 57 / 60 | 95.0% | +16.7 pts vs Stock (11v1, p = 0.0063) |
| Blind 3-Arm Union Coverage | Gemini 4 Argon + WIL | 49 / 60 | 81.7% | +37.0 pts vs OpenAI o1 |
| Stock · Zero-Shot Blind Control | Gemini 4 Argon | 47 / 60 | 78.3% | +33.7 pts vs OpenAI o1 |
| Theia · 100% Blind Batch-10 WIL (V1 / 3-Vote) | Gemini 4 Argon | 46 / 60 | 76.7% | +32.0 pts vs OpenAI o1 |
| By Subspecialty Modality (60 MedXpertQA-MM Cases: Theia V2 vs Blind Stock Argon) | ||||
| CT (Head, Chest, Abdomen, Spine, CTA) | 15 cases (5-option) | 15 / 15 | 100.0% | +13.3 pts (Stock 13/15, 86.7%) |
| Structural MRI (Brain, Spine, MSK, MRA) | 15 cases (5-option) | 15 / 15 | 100.0% | +26.7 pts (Stock 11/15, 73.3%) |
| PET-CT · Nuclear · Functional Imaging | 5 cases (5-option) | 5 / 5 | 100.0% | +40.0 pts (Stock 3/5, 60.0%) |
| Ultrasound · Echocardiography · Doppler | 10 cases (5-option) | 9 / 10 | 90.0% | +10.0 pts (Stock 8/10, 80.0%) |
| Plain-Film X-Ray · Mammo · Fluoro · Angio | 15 cases (5-option) | 13 / 15 | 86.7% | +6.7 pts (Stock 12/15, 80.0%) |
| Published ICML 2025 MedXpertQA-MM Leaderboard & Eurorad Human Radiologist Baselines | ||||
| Board-Certified Attending Radiologists | Eurorad / RadLE (spot dx) | — | 83.0% | Published attending reference |
| Radiology Residents / Registrars | Eurorad / RadLE (spot dx) | — | 45.0% | Published trainee reference |
| OpenAI o1 (#1 ICML 2025 Leaderboard) | MedXpertQA-MM (arXiv:2501.18362) | — | 44.7% | 46.2% MM Reasoning |
| OpenAI GPT-4o | MedXpertQA-MM | — | 30.4% | 30.6% MM Reasoning |
| Alibaba QVQ-72B-Preview | MedXpertQA-MM | — | 21.8% | 22.1% MM Reasoning |
| Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet | MedXpertQA-MM | — | 21.3% | 19.9% MM Reasoning |
| Google Gemini 2.0 Flash / 1.5 Pro | MedXpertQA-MM | — | 20.6% / 19.7% | 20.5% / 19.2% MM Reasoning |
| Alibaba Qwen2.5-VL-72B | MedXpertQA-MM | — | 18.0% | Random 5-option guess = 20.0% |
Sealed 2 November 2026 (internal benchmark record, sha256 13bd2320cea0748b..., 360 sealed files, 0 changed). Both 100% blind arms (76.7%–78.3%, union 81.7%) and Subspecialty Landmark WIL V2 (95.0%, p = 0.0063 vs Stock Argon) are reported in full.
01C · Head to head with Harrison.Rad 1.5 on Plain-Film X-Ray
| System | Only it right | Only Harrison right | p, all 45 | Where Harrison answered (36) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theia · Visual-Anchored WIL (Argon V2) | 19 | 0 | 0.000004 | 36 vs 25 (100.0% vs 69.4%), p = 0.00098 |
| Stock · Gemini 4 Argon (Zero-Shot Blind) | 13 | 2 | 0.0074 | 30 vs 25 (83.3% vs 69.4%), p = 0.18 |
| Stock · Claude Opus 5.5 | 13 | 3 | 0.021 | 29 vs 25 (80.6% vs 69.4%), p = 0.34 |
| Theia · Unanchored WIL (Argon V1) | 11 | 4 | 0.118 | 26 vs 25 (72.2% vs 69.4%), p = 1.0 |
| Theia + Alpha + Omega · GLM 5.3 Flash | 12 | 6 | 0.24 | 25 vs 25, p = 1.0 |
Exact two-sided McNemar test, paired by question. Harrison did not answer 9 of the 45 (note 6); the last column compares only the 36 it answered.
580 / 658 (88.15% Full-Stack WIL · 91.03% Union) vs 556 / 658 (84.50% Stock Argon), p = 0.00267
To test the same no-Crossroads WARNINGINFINITYLOOP.md + 5-Layer Full-Stack Hecate architecture beyond medical imaging across the seven flagship frontier benchmarks used on OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google model launch cards, we executed a pre-registered, physically key-vaulted 658-item evaluation (internal benchmark record, internal record, 106 sealed files, 0 modified):
| Flagship Benchmark Suite | Items (N) | Full-Stack Hecate WIL | Full-Stack Omega Council | Stock Gemini 4 Argon | 3-Arm Blind Union | Published External Baselines (o1 / o3 / Claude / PhD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 (100% Official Set) | 30 | 30 / 30 (100.0%) | 30 / 30 (100.0%) | 29 / 30 (96.7%) | 30 / 30 (100.0%) | o3-high 96.7% · Claude 3.7 80.0% · DeepSeek-R1 79.8% · o1 79.2% |
| AIME 2024 (100% Official Set) | 30 | 29 / 30 (96.7%) | 29 / 30 (96.7%) | 30 / 30 (100.0%) | 30 / 30 (100.0%) | o3-high 96.7% · o1 83.3% · DeepSeek-R1 79.8% · Claude 3.5 16.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (100% Official Set) | 198 | 182 / 198 (91.9%) | 185 / 198 (93.4%) | 187 / 198 (94.4%) | 189 / 198 (95.5%) | o3 87.7% · Claude 3.7 84.8% · o1 78.0% · Human PhD Experts 69.7% |
| Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) | 100 | 61 / 100 (61.0%) | 59 / 100 (59.0%) | 52 / 100 (52.0%) | 66 / 100 (66.0%) | o3 / Deep Research 26.6% · Gemini 2.5 Pro 18.8% · Claude 3.7 8.9% · o1 8.8% |
| OlympiadBench (IMO Math) | 100 | 96 / 100 (96.0%) | 94 / 100 (94.0%) | 91 / 100 (91.0%) | 96 / 100 (96.0%) | 5 vs 0 discordant vs Stock Argon (zero regressions on WIL) |
| MMLU-Pro (10 Options A–J) | 100 | 96 / 100 (96.0%) | 95 / 100 (95.0%) | 93 / 100 (93.0%) | 97 / 100 (97.0%) | Claude 3.7 84.8% · o1 84.1% · DeepSeek-R1 84.0% · GPT-4o 74.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified (DeepMind) | 100 | 86 / 100 (86.0%) | 84 / 100 (84.0%) | 74 / 100 (74.0%) | 90 / 100 (90.0%) | +12.0 pp vs Stock (16 vs 4, p = 0.0118) · o1 42.6% · GPT-4o 38.2% |
| All 7 Flagship Frontier Suites Combined | 658 | 580 / 658 (88.15%) | 576 / 658 (87.54%) | 556 / 658 (84.50%) | 599 / 658 (91.03%) | +3.65 pp (42 vs 18 discordant, exact McNemar p = 0.00267) |
Where it would rank: an estimate
The closest human benchmark
- 26 newly qualified UK radiologists sat 10 mock FRCR plain-film rapid-reporting exams.
- They averaged 84.8%, ranging from 76.1% to 91.9% (BMJ, 2022).
- On that spread, Theia Visual-Anchored WIL on Gemini 4 Argon at 97.8% (44/45) exceeds the top of the published cohort range (91.9%), while zero-shot Stock Gemini 4 Argon sits at 80.0% (36/45).
- Across CT, structural MRI, clinical Ultrasound, and 4D BOLD fMRI, Theia scored 40 / 40 (100.0%).
Read it as an estimate
- Different questions and format: not a head-to-head.
- Assumes a normal spread (standard deviation about 4 points).
- The pilot below measures it directly, on your case mix.
- Test the reader the way you would test a new registrar.
How we test
Rules first
Questions, scoring and void rules are written and saved before the first model call. Every amendment is dated and kept.
Instructions on file
The exact instructions each system received are read back from its stored system prompt and kept with the results.
Research first
Theia researches before it answers. The full protocol requires 35 logged web look-ups per question. The archives that host the test cases are off limits, and every search result and page fetch is logged.
Sealed answers
Answers are saved and hashed before the answer key is opened. The model never sees the key.
Void for all
If the examiner breaks a question, it is removed for every system, never only for the one that missed it. One question was removed this way, leaving 45.
First answer stands
Reruns made "just in case" are logged and never replace the scored answer.
Re-scored from raw files
Every grade is re-derived by a separate script from the raw run files, with file hashes on record.
Test it on films it has never seen
What we are asking for
- Stage one: 30 unpublished plain films from your archive, de-identified on site.
- Stage two: 150 films, enough to measure a real difference rather than noise.
- Readers: your radiologists read the same films; marking is blind to who answered, in FRCR short-case style.
What you get
- A measured percentile for Theia against practising radiologists, on your case mix.
- Governance: ethics or QA-exemption sign-off before any image leaves your site. Research use only.
- Credit: your team co-authors the result, whatever it shows.
The same discipline, in your business
We build and install AI into working businesses: clinics, practices, venues, property and professional services. Every system is tested the way Theia is tested before it touches your customers.
Front desk and bookings
Voice reception and outbound booking agents on your own phone line. In a recorded test call, our outbound agent booked a consultation in 79 seconds.
Research and reporting
Research agents, structured report drafts and evidence retrieval, with a human signing off every output that matters.
Workflow and memory
Email, calendar, CRM and document workflows joined up, with a persistent memory so your systems stop forgetting what your team already told them.
Three hours observing your business, then sixty hours of structured AI analysis. You receive the single best way to increase your revenue, and the plan to install it.
Eight hours observing, for complex operations, multi-site businesses and enterprises.
Pay only on the measured difference: 20% of your result with us minus your result without us.
The fine print
- Questions: 85 sealed vision-required imaging questions (
ITEMS-ALL-85.json, sha2563b677f49084e7d75...): 45 plain-film X-ray questions from the public RadBench closed set (Harrison.ai,q340voided for all systems after an examiner error), plus 10 CT, 10 structural MRI, and 10 clinical Ultrasound disease/anatomy diagnosis cases from held-out OmniMedVQA/RadImageNet test splits, and 10 4D BOLD fMRI neuroimaging cases rendered from OpenNeuro datasetsds006623andds005684. - Execution & sealing (2 November 2026): Every Gemini 4 Argon Theia arm ran under the no-Crossroads
WARNINGINFINITYLOOP.mdcontract (sha256936d7abb580f7f81...) with 35 banned-domain-filtered primary EuropePMC literature lookups per item (2,975 queries total, 0 hits from Radiopaedia, MedPix, Harrison.ai, Hugging Face, or OpenNeuro). The answer key (sha256591d0331d12bb391...) was vaulted outside the workspace untilinternal benchmark recordlocked all 425 raw answer and research files. - Ablation of Language-Prior Overwrite (V1 vs V2): In unanchored V1 (
32/45on X-Ray,40/40 = 100%on CT/MRI/Ultrasound/fMRI), injecting 35 generic literature snippets without a binary normality gate caused text base-rates (e.g., C2 odontoid prevalence and emergency false-negative avoidance) to flip 5 X-ray items that zero-shot Stock Gemini 4 Argon (36/45 = 80.0%, p = 0.0074 vs Harrison.Rad 1.5) answered correctly. Adding Visual-Anchored subspecialty gating (V2, documented inPREREG-ARGON-MM85-V2.md) eliminated those flips and reached44/45(97.8%, p = 0.0215 vs Stock Argon; p = 4 × 10−6 vs Harrison.Rad 1.5). Both V1 and V2 are reported in full. - Radiologist percentile: Shelmerdine et al., BMJ 2022, 26 newly qualified radiologists, mean 84.8%, range 76.1% to 91.9%, assuming a normal spread. Different questions and format, so this is an estimate, not a head-to-head.
- All test images come from published clinical/research repositories. Only unseen clinical films remove training-overlap doubt.
- Harrison.Rad 1.5 was run through its public demo on 17 September on the 45 plain-film items. It did not answer 9 of the 45: its input check rejected one pacemaker film (3 questions), it disputed the premise of 4, and 2 fell outside its stated plain-film scope. These count as wrong in the 45-question figures and are excluded in the 36-question column.
- Earlier September UMBRA-DS DeepSeek/Opus runs were voided by operator audit on 25 September 2026 and are excluded from this page.